# Tokenholder Proposal: Resourcing Orca for Its Next Phase **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance Proposals\ **Created:** [September 29, 2026, 12:36pm UTC](https://forums.orca.so/t/tokenholder-proposal-resourcing-orca-for-its-next-phase/1281 "2026-09-29T12:36:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![RKingMidas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e0b2c6/32.png) [@RKingMidas](https://forums.orca.so/u/RKingMidas)\ **Post date:** [October 6, 2026, 9:03pm UTC](https://forums.orca.so/t/tokenholder-proposal-resourcing-orca-for-its-next-phase/1281/7 "2026-10-06T21:03:16Z")
Claude reworded: > Follow-up with specific questions, since voting closes Oct 10: > > 1. **Name the acquisition target** , or at least its revenue, profitability, TVL and the price. Tokenholders should vote on the deal itself. Handing over 14.2M ORCA and 70k SOL, with a report 14 days after closing, is not a vote. > 2. **How do No votes count?** The forum says it passes at 3,000,000 Yes. If there are 3M Yes and 5M No, does it pass? On-chain, Yes and No are set up as separate options. > 3. **xORCA holders can’t vote.** The docs promise xORCA “boosted voting power,” but only deposited ORCA counts, and unstaking takes 7 days, longer than the vote. The holders losing 75% of their rewards are shut out. Extend the vote or let xORCA count. > 4. **Publish an itemized budget for the 80%.** The last numbers, from January, were about 42 staff and $11M a year. > 5. **Split this into separate votes:** the fee split, the treasury transfer and dissolving the Council. > 6. **Add an end or review date to the 10/10/80 split** , and keep a tokenholder vote on the fee split. > > xORCA holders backed this project because of a small team and a growing burn. This proposal reverses both without the transparency to judge it. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.orca.so/t/tokenholder-proposal-resourcing-orca-for-its-next-phase/1281)._